Discussion about this post

User's avatar
huskercr's avatar

A fascinating exploration of why Earth has the water it does and why Mercury, Venus, the Moon and Mars do not. The jury is of course still out as to how rare Earth and life are in the cosmos, and your hopeful analysis at the end of the piece was encouraging.

William E. S.'s avatar

Thanks for the two articles, I enjoyed the read.

A question. If this is true, it would imply that liquid oceans are ultimately determined by terrestrial planet mass; any planet formed within a proper region of a protostellar disk would sequester and then outgas Hydrogen and Oxygen to form water; and any planet of sufficient mass would have a geology that could preserve that liquid surface water.

If this is true, and plate tectonics are a function of liquid water differentiating continental and oceanic crust and providing mantle lubrication so the plates can move; then why didn't Venus develop plate tectonics and thus have a sequestration cycle that would prevent its runaway atmospheric buildup and water loss? Are plate tectonics more complicated than I realize, or did the amount of water on Venus result in too much of one kind of crust? Or is the thought that Venus's proximity to the Sun never allowed the surface to cool enough for oceans to pool and begin the tectonic sequestration cycle?

No posts

Ready for more?